RoboCop’s Prime Directives

Is it just me, or is it a bit ironic that raising the money to build a RoboCop statue in a cash-strapped city like Detroit works against RoboCop’s prime directives?

Unless of course, the fourth “Classified” directive was actually “Never oppose making bourgie white hipsters snicker.”

In case you have no idea what I’m talking about here’s a link to the whole story.

Technically the RoboCop statue isn’t breaking any laws, but it certainly doesn’t do anything to uphold the law either, so I think this all falls into a bit of gray area in regards to the third prime directive. I’m not sure what Murphy would’ve done because I don’t think that RoboCop made a lot of room for gray areas …

But the whole fiasco clearly violates the public trust and protecting the innocent.  The Neighborhood Service Organization (homeless shelters), community health clinics, and so on all could probably make $50,000 go a long way.  Or if we needed a statue (who doesn’t love a good statue?), couldn’t we build one to an inspiring Detroiter who actually existed? Viola Liuzzo, Detroit freedom rider and civil rights martyr? Alice Herz, German antiwar activist who immolated herself on Cass Ave. in protest of the Vietnam War?

https://i1.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8e/Viola_Liuzzo.jpg

Viola Liuzzo, Detroiter and civil rights martyr. Let's build a statue for her!

Okay, but the best response this whole fiasco, in my opinion, isn’t to argue about money and where it could go and so on. I’m not going to say that Detroit doesn’t need money, because that’s obviously not true, but in the scheme of Detroit’s money problems $50,000 isn’t that much.

https://i0.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/1-thumbaug25moroun1.jpg

Matty Moroun, the enemy. Let's build a statue of him and then burn it down.

The real money in the city is wasted by letting robber barons like Matty Moroun sit on huge public interests like the Ambassador Bridge, or crumbling properties like the Depot station. RoboCop, in the spirit of his first prime directive, would have totally got Moroun by now with his Auto-9.

The real money is wasted by things far bigger than a couple hundred hipsters looking for an easy laugh at the city’s expense.  What about the federal government (who would be tripping over themselves to help this city if 360 White people were being murdered every year) who wastes money on two wars or tax breaks for the wealthy?  Or the city government through corruption, or simply losing money in its Kafkaesque bureaucratic labyrinth?

Detroit doesn’t need any more charity, and that’s not really coming up in this conversation.  I mean, Detroit is a city whose policies are shaped, in the fashion of capitalism, around business interests rather than the public’s.  Detroit needs mass action, resistance, and revolutionary systemic social change.

RoboCop eventually turned his guns on his corporate overloads, OmniCorp. Maybe there’s something we can learn from him (but that doesn’t mean we need a statue of him!)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to RoboCop’s Prime Directives

  1. . says:

    referencing kafka automatically makes anything you say right! your(/youre) writing is kafkaesque, actually. i like how you appropriate the contraction “it’s” to replace the possessive pronoun “its.” it’S(/its) like the possessive pronoun (capitalism) is being placed by the hybridized pronoun-verb (activism)!

  2. . says:

    nonono it’s(/its) cooler when its intentional!

  3. Evan says:

    I think that the Robocop statue is a positive element. Why?
    it’s an attraction. people will come to detroit to see it. bringing people to detroit is positive. when someone comes to detroit to see the statue they will also go to a restaurant or bar, or get gas. the point is, money will be spent in the city. money will be spent on the statue, which is spent on supplies to build the statue, which stimulates the economy.

    RoboCop was awesome. I don’t see a problem here.

    • I don’t really care one way or the other if it’s built, but really? Do you really think it’s going to attract that much tourism, or are you just saying that. I question the whole sincerity of that line of reasoning. I think people say that to make it sound like there’s a good reason for the statue to exist, when they really just want to see it get built for irony and humor’s sake.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s